Posterior hip replacements for patients with osteoarthritis or that have experienced trauma to their hip a total hip replacement can restore function and decrease pain.
Hip replacement anterior versus posterior.
This is done by replacing the damaged or diseased bone with a metal or plastic implant which is designed to replicate a healthy hip joint.
It is a technique that patients seek out for several reasons.
For example a study of 505 anterior hip replacements and 1288 posterior hip replacements found that 7 1 4 of the anterior hip patients had wound healing problems compared to 5 0 2 of the posterior patients.
During this traditional approach the orthopedic surgeon makes an 8 10 inch while you lie on your side.
The big difference in anterior vs posterior hip replacement is primarily where the incision is made and how long it is.
This incision typically starts at the top of the pelvic bone iliac crest and extends down toward the top of the thigh.
In the short term anterior hip replacement is less painful and leads to a quicker recovery of mobility and strength compared to a posterior or lateral approach.
The anterior approach to doing a total hip replacement has been gaining popularity in the us over the last ten years.
In a posterior hip replacement the procedure is done on the side of the hip.
The average hip replacement lasts 20 30 years or more.
The long term outcome is very good.
Rheumatoid arthritis is the most popular reason for thr but you may also need the operation due to a broken hip bone tumors or avascular necrosis a bone that didn t get enough blood featured image source.
The most obvious difference between anterior and posterior hip replacement surgeries is the location of the incisions.
There is renewed interest in the news and medical world lately regarding surgical approaches to hip replacement specifically anterior through the front of the hip versus posterior through the back of the hip methods.
Anterior hip replacement surgery uses an incision at the front of the hip.