Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2018

This may make hip resurfacing a better choice for people who need to squat for work.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2018.

The risk of fracture is higher for older people especially small framed women whose bones have been weakened by osteoporosis. This is because it requires manipulation of the femoral head to the placement of the metallic ball. The difference between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement both hip surgeries are full joint replacement procedures says dr. Hip resurfacing and hip replacement both involve removing the damaged hip joint and replacing it with a prosthetic.

Nderwent surface replacement arthroplasty with use of the bhr implant and consented to study participation. Both surgeries treat the ball and the socket in the hip joint. Preservation of bone on the thigh bone potentially making revision surgery easier. Potential advantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing is a bigger and more complicated procedure than hip replacement even though it results in less bone loss. But there are differences in the implant materials used and in the degree to which the joint anatomy is affected. However in some patients metal particles are released by the implant causing tissue reactions. However hip resurfacing preserves more bone and is often considered to be a better solution than hip replacement.

Patient reported outcomes and complication and revision data were collected at a minimum of 5 years of follow up for 93 324 of 350 of the hips in surviving patients. You should speak to an orthopaedic surgeon about the best options in your individual circumstances. Get useful helpful and relevant health wellness information. Reduced risk for dislocation where the ball disengages from the socket due to the large size of the ball when compared to most hip replacements.

For young active patients metal hip resurfacing already lasts longer than total hip replacement. One study see prior link above found that in females and males with smaller femoral heads hip resurfacing wasn t as effective as hip replacement and in women in particular the hip resurfacing devices were failing on average about five years earlier than a hip replacement prosthetic. A matched cohort analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes between use of the bhr and total hip arthroplasty. The best candidates for hip resurfacing are men under 60 who have strong healthy bone.

This may require a bugger incision than hip replacement. Hip resurfacing expert in minnesota.